
Whether you are a brand new Certified Everything DiSC Practitioner or someone who is just starting out, you'll find this page full of helpful information.
Need help? Just email me at [email protected].
Watch the videos to learn how to use Catalyst with your learners, to simplify your administrative processes, and to keep learning
Access the new Catalyst Practitioner Experience Platform FREE for one year
Download activities and short-cuts to make your life easier
Keep growing your Everything DiSC practice
This video provides tips for making improving the feedback process. (20 minutes)
See the tools available to your learners including micro-learning modules, comparisons with their colleagues, group reports, and personlized tips for success. (12 minutes)
See how easy it can be to manage your profiles, departments, and groups right within Catalyst. (14 minutes)
One-hour management training modules and action plans built right in Catalyst: Giving Feedback, Managing Conflict, Empowering Your Team, Navigating Change, Motivating Your Team. Plus step-by-step scripts makes your job as a facilitator a piece of cake! (14 minutes)
The more profiles you order, the crazier your Catalyst Admin and EPIC Dashboards can get. Watch this video to get tips and tricks for organizing your files, as well as deleting former employees, and reclaiming unused credits. (20 minutes)
See how you can save time by getting all your facilitation materials for Everything DiSC Fundamentals, Workplace, Agile EQ, Management, and the new Worksmart Modules in one place. Plus, FREE Facilitator Reports, Group Culture Reports, and Comparisons! (10 minutes)

Build your knowledge, toolkit, and confidence to facilitate workshops, teambuilding sessions, coaching conversations, and more.

Get one year access to the new Catalyst Practitioner Experience Platform with upgraded, downloadable facilitation materials and ongoing learning.

Don't have a kit? You can enroll in the new Catalyst Practitioner Experience to get Workplace, Management, and Agile EQ facilitation materials plus ongoing training for one year.

Okay, I admit. I don't throw anything away. But, there are so many great new resources available, I think it's time to upgrade!
Whether your looking for new classroom materials, resources to create engaging virtual sessions, tools to create powerful coaching conversations, candidate screening assessments, 360 degree feedback, or turnkey team building materials, I'm here to help.
Feel free to email me at [email protected] to brainstorm ideas or identify ways to achieve your goals.
I appreciate your business and look forward to seeing you soon!
Amy Pearl

Explore our assessments for candidate screening, development, team building, succession planning, and more.

Together
Give the women in your organization the coaching, confidence, and connections they need to have successful careers and a fabulous lives.

Made Easy
Create an amazing learning experience
whether your team is
at the office, at home, or on the go.

Ignited
Be the best leader you can be
with this award-winning
learning opportunity.

Breakthrough
Create a workplace you love with our best-selling book, employee survey, and interactive team experience.

Conversations
Replace your archaic review process
with an online system to
guide GREAT conversations.







Quick Answer
Sometimes, yes. Failure to perfectly match a target job profile doesn’t automatically disqualify someone. What actually matters is which specific area is off, how far off it is, and whether the trait in question tends to be fixed or one that flexes with coaching and experience. A mismatch is a prompt to ask better questions, not a verdict handed down by a graph.
This is one of the questions I get asked most often, usually by a hiring manager staring at a report with a slightly furrowed brow, wondering if they’re allowed to like a candidate the results don't fully endorse. You are. A fit score is a compass, guiding you to ask better questions in your follow up interviews and reference checks.
Once upon a time, I was working with a leadership team of a small manufacturing company and I ran into a funny fit dilemma. Often, executives have three common Motivational Interests. They tend to be interested in business activities like sales and delivering presentations, financial activities like budgeting and managing the numbers, and either serving people (if they are people-oriented) or technical activities (if they are more task-oriented). Well, almost every member of this particular leadership team was motivated by mechanical pursuits like hands-on activities and building things. You might say, "well, of course, Amy, it's a manufacturing company." Remember, these were executives who advanced beyond the day-to-day work. A preference for mechanical work could have resulted in them spending too much time in the weeds versus focusing on business strategy and leadership.
Here's the funny thing...as I got to know them, I learned that they all owned, built, or drove race cars. In fact, it was something that brought them all together and it was the outlet for their mechanical desires. But, if you just looked at their assessment results, you might not have hired them assuming that they had stronger preferences for doing the work rather than leading the organization.
No candidate is perfect and an assessment is not meant to be a yes-or-no decision maker. It's a tool to guide your actions through the balance of the hiring process, as well as the coaching approach you'll initiate on Day 1 if you choose to hire the candidate.
Follow these 5 steps as a guide to determine how risky the hiring mismatch might be.
Not all mismatches carry the same weight, and treating them like they do is where most hiring managers go wrong. A critical thinking or thinking style mismatch, especially one below the range for a role with real cognitive demands, matters more than people usually assume, because it tends to reflect a fairly stable ceiling rather than something that improves with training. Behavioral and personality mismatches are a different animal entirely. Someone who’s more unassuming than a role’s Performance Model calls for isn’t lacking a fixed ability, they simply default to a different style, one that can shift situationally when the role demands it. A Motivational Interests mismatch sits somewhere in between: it’s not about capability at all, it’s about whether the day-to-day work is likely to hold someone’s attention long term.
Note: Different assessments measure different things. If you aren't using a comprehensive tool, check out my blog post called "What Do Pre-Employment Assessments Actually Measure?"
Context matters as much as direction. Remember that no one is ever a perfect match. You will likely see candidates whose scores are above or below your desired range. How important is that characteristic for success in the position, for the hiring manager, and to support the organization's culture? It might be a gap that isn't very important to you. Also consider how far out of the range the score actually is. Is it just a tad bit outside of the range? Or, does a candidate bringing more of something to the table present new opportunities for you?
This is worth understanding on its own, because it changes how forgiving you can afford to be. Behaviors and personality traits live on a continuum, and some people can flex toward the other end of that continuum situationally, especially with the right coaching and enough motivation to do it. An unassuming candidate might learn to speak up especially once they become comfortable in the role. A more deliberate decision-maker can learn to move faster when you're clear about priorities and timelines.
Critical thinking skills don't flex the same way. The research I’ve written about before is fairly consistent that cognitive ability is one of the more stable traits a person carries into adulthood, which means a real gap there deserves more caution than an equivalent-looking gap in a behavioral scale.
It's worth considering the real cost of being wrong in either direction for a specific role based on the scope and breadth of that role. A professional individual contributor role and a role managing a team of twelve carry very different stakes for the same size of mismatch.
Finally, hiring managers should be realistic in how much time and effort they are willing to put into the coaching process. Some managers have a real gift for developing talent and thrive on the ability to help people grow into successful contributors. For other managers, this falls to the bottom of the priority list. If it's a coachable trait and you're willing to put the time in, go for it!
A miss on a few characteristics, paired with a strong interview and solid references, is usually a yellow flag worth exploring rather than a reason to pass. Ask direct, specific questions about the gaps. If a role calls for someone more autonomous and the candidate’s results lean more reliant, ask them to walk you through a time they had to make a significant decision with minimal guidance, and listen for whether they actually did it, or whether they froze and waited for someone else to step in. The answer tells you far more than the score alone ever could. The good news is that assessments like PXT Select provide recommended interview questions to help you determine how an individual has closed those gaps in the past. It makes it easy for recruiters and hiring managers to quickly learn how big a risk it actually is. Download a sample of the PXT Comprehensive Selection Report here.
Some mismatches deserve real weight, and pretending otherwise does nobody any favors. A significant gap in critical thinking skills for a role where the complexity is going to climb is worth taking seriously. The same goes for other characteristics that you know are essential for success in the position, with the team, and in the organization. A borderline mismatch that you validate with a shaky reference or a vague interview answer, might also become a "no go." One yellow flag alone rarely means no. Several pointing the same direction usually does.
What if the mismatch is specifically in critical thinking skills or thinking style? Take it more seriously than a behavior, personality, or motivational interests mismatch of similar size, particularly if the role’s complexity is likely to grow over time.
Can someone “outperform” a lower fit score? Yes, especially when the gap is in a flexible trait, the rest of the evidence/interview/references is strong, and the coaching process starts on Day 1. Fit scores describe a tendency, not a guarantee. Download a sample of the PXT Select Coaching Report to see how it can give you a quick boost for understanding and closing gaps with your new hires.
What if HR loves a candidate but the assessment results don’t match? That’s not a contradiction to resolve in favor of one side automatically. Assessments open your eyes to things you might miss and other people will likely have different perspectives. Check out my blog post "3 is the Magic Number Behind Every Great Hire" to learn how to overcome perception mismatches.
Should I tell a candidate about their fit or match to our target profile? I do not recommend that you share assessment results with candidates until you hire them. And then, absolutely yes, you should integrate the results into several steps on the onboarding path. Explore all the PXT Select Reports to get ideas for using assessment results post-hire. It's a great way to maximize the return on your investment in candidate screening assessments.
Is there a fit so poor I should never proceed? There’s no hard universal cutoff, but a very low score combined with real concerns from the interview or references is a different situation than a moderate score standing alone. After you use an assessment tool for a while, you'll start to get a feel for thresholds you are willing to tolerate and characteristics that are particularly important to your organization.
Does the answer change for an internal promotion versus an external hire? Somewhat. With an internal candidate, you usually have years of actual observed performance to weigh against the assessment, which is far richer evidence than an interview and references for an external candidate. That track record should carry real weight alongside the fit score, not get overridden by it. Warning! Don't be tempted to skip the assessment, just because you know the individual. The objective data an assessment provides is an excellent way to eliminate bias in your promotional decisions while understanding the potential strengths and risks of the employee moving into a new position.
If you haven’t read "3 is the Magic Number Behind Every Great Hire," it’s the piece that explains why a mismatch should never be the sole deciding factor in the first place. And if you want to understand exactly how a Performance Model or job profile gets built, "What is a Job Profile?" walks through that in full.
A lower fit is information, not a final determination. Use it to ask better questions, not to make the decision for you.
Want to talk through a specific candidate's questionable results? Book a free demo and I’ll walk you through exactly how to intepret results that aren't cut and dried.
Stay Ignited!