
You use data to make decisions in every aspect of your organization. You should use data to make people decisions as well.
Science-backed assessments used for onboarding, training, and team building increase employee retention, speed up leadership development, create stronger teams, and transform your workplace culture, creating a positive return on investment in every area of your business. Afterall, better people decisions create better business results.
I'm Amy and I've made it my mission to take the guesswork out of assessment selection, implementation, and administration. This guide is a great place to start. You'll get instant access to:
10 questions to consider while choosing assessments for your organization
Comparisons of features and certification options
Pricing of certification programs and profiles
Suggestions to make your assessment program a success

Explore our assessments for candidate screening, development, team building, succession planning, and more.

Together
Give the women in your organization the coaching, confidence, and connections they need to have successful careers and a fabulous lives.

Made Easy
Create an amazing learning experience
whether your team is
at the office, at home, or on the go.

Ignited
Be the best leader you can be
with this award-winning
learning opportunity.

Breakthrough
Create a workplace you love with our best-selling book, employee survey, and interactive team experience.

Conversations
Replace your archaic review process
with an online system to
guide GREAT conversations.
Reduce hiring mistakes by finding the right candidates faster with the most comprehensive candidate screening assessment on the market today. PXT Select measures thinking skills, behavioral traits, and motivational interests in one 45-minute assessment.
Perfect for HR professionals who need to:
Screen candidates faster and reduce time-to-hire with data-driven decisions
Get recommended interview questions based on candidates' fit
Give managers coaching tips to manager so new hires start strong
Identify succession candidates and support career pathways
Improve retention by hiring for cultural fit
15 free supplemental reports support job profiling, onboarding, coaching, leadership development, teambuilding, succession planning, and more.
EEOC Compliant |Valid & Reliable |30+ Years of Research


Build better communication, stronger teams, and effective leaders with Everything DiSC, the world's leading behavioral assessment used by 10+ million learners in 150,000+ organizations.
Ideal for Learning and Development professionals who need to:
Improve team communication and reduce conflict
Develop leaders at all levels
Facilitate dynamic teambuilding workshops that strengthen relationships and team effectiveness
Coach individuals to build agility and emotional intelligence
Expand their toolkit of customizable facilitator resources
Create a common language for workplace interactions
Plus, the Catalyst Platform gives learners ongoing access to dozens of micro-learning modules, the ability to create comparison and group reports with their colleagues, and to get personalized tips for effectiveness.
90% accuracy rating from learners | 40+ years of research |
Mobile-friendly for remote teams
Accelerate leadership development with comprehensive feedback from managers, peers, direct reports, and others. Our customizable 360 degree feedback assessment is branded for your organization and provide actionable insights for leadership growth.
Perfect for learning and coaching professionals who need to:
Develop high potential employees
Build leaders' self-awareness of their strengths and blindspots
Add a new twist to performance review processes
Populate nine-block or other people planning templates
Measure leadership competency development over time
Your 360 will be designed to reflect your values, leadership competencies, and cultural norms. Plus, we'll develop an actionable Learn and Grow Guide to give participants' recommendations and progress tracking tools to build accountability for change.
Fully Customizable | One-on-One Debrief Services Available


Transform your team with Patrick Lencioni's proven framework for building trust, healthy conflict, commitment, peer-to-peer accountability, and a spirit of shared results. Based on the best selling book, The Five Dysfunctions of a Team.
Perfect for facilitators who need to:
Diagnose team dysfunction in a non-threatening way
Facilitate thought-provoking team building experiences with leader at all levels or functional teams
Improve collaboration among project teams
Build trust in newly formed or cross-functional teams
The optional integration of Everything DiSC allows team members to understand how their styles contribute to or hinder teamwork. Plus, an annotated facilitator's report gives you a page-by-page script of how to lead the team to success.
Build the capacity, credibility, and confidence of your learning and development team by getting certified. We give you the training and tools you need to make the impact you desire at a cost you can afford.

Be inspired.
Take a deep dive into the research and profiles while joining a network of assessment lovers like you.

Expand your toolkit.
Get full facilitator kits with scripts, customizable PowerPoints, videos and online dashboards.

Build your expertise.
Earn continuing education credentia, while boosting your credibility and
your confidence.

Serve your team.
Make an impact on your organization. In fact, you could be the reason that people love their jobs again.

I'm so glad that you're exploring our assessment solutions. For three decades, I've used assessments in just about every imaginable application: candidate screening, leadership development, team building, training, succession planning, organizational analytics...the list goes on.
But, what I love best is working with Human Resources and L&D professionals who want to build their knowledge, toolkit, and confidence in using assessments. So, let's hop on a call to talk about your needs. No pushy sales conversations and no BS. 😉
You can see that in DiSC in am Conscientious and Dominant. So, we'll talk about your goals, weigh the pros and cons of various options, identify the best assessment for you.
I welcome the opportunity to help you thrive!










Quick Answer
Sometimes, yes. Failure to perfectly match a target job profile doesn’t automatically disqualify someone. What actually matters is which specific area is off, how far off it is, and whether the trait in question tends to be fixed or one that flexes with coaching and experience. A mismatch is a prompt to ask better questions, not a verdict handed down by a graph.
This is one of the questions I get asked most often, usually by a hiring manager staring at a report with a slightly furrowed brow, wondering if they’re allowed to like a candidate the results don't fully endorse. You are. A fit score is a compass, guiding you to ask better questions in your follow up interviews and reference checks.
Once upon a time, I was working with a leadership team of a small manufacturing company and I ran into a funny fit dilemma. Often, executives have three common Motivational Interests. They tend to be interested in business activities like sales and delivering presentations, financial activities like budgeting and managing the numbers, and either serving people (if they are people-oriented) or technical activities (if they are more task-oriented). Well, almost every member of this particular leadership team was motivated by mechanical pursuits like hands-on activities and building things. You might say, "well, of course, Amy, it's a manufacturing company." Remember, these were executives who advanced beyond the day-to-day work. A preference for mechanical work could have resulted in them spending too much time in the weeds versus focusing on business strategy and leadership.
Here's the funny thing...as I got to know them, I learned that they all owned, built, or drove race cars. In fact, it was something that brought them all together and it was the outlet for their mechanical desires. But, if you just looked at their assessment results, you might not have hired them assuming that they had stronger preferences for doing the work rather than leading the organization.
No candidate is perfect and an assessment is not meant to be a yes-or-no decision maker. It's a tool to guide your actions through the balance of the hiring process, as well as the coaching approach you'll initiate on Day 1 if you choose to hire the candidate.
Follow these 5 steps as a guide to determine how risky the hiring mismatch might be.
Not all mismatches carry the same weight, and treating them like they do is where most hiring managers go wrong. A critical thinking or thinking style mismatch, especially one below the range for a role with real cognitive demands, matters more than people usually assume, because it tends to reflect a fairly stable ceiling rather than something that improves with training. Behavioral and personality mismatches are a different animal entirely. Someone who’s more unassuming than a role’s Performance Model calls for isn’t lacking a fixed ability, they simply default to a different style, one that can shift situationally when the role demands it. A Motivational Interests mismatch sits somewhere in between: it’s not about capability at all, it’s about whether the day-to-day work is likely to hold someone’s attention long term.
Note: Different assessments measure different things. If you aren't using a comprehensive tool, check out my blog post called "What Do Pre-Employment Assessments Actually Measure?"
Context matters as much as direction. Remember that no one is ever a perfect match. You will likely see candidates whose scores are above or below your desired range. How important is that characteristic for success in the position, for the hiring manager, and to support the organization's culture? It might be a gap that isn't very important to you. Also consider how far out of the range the score actually is. Is it just a tad bit outside of the range? Or, does a candidate bringing more of something to the table present new opportunities for you?
This is worth understanding on its own, because it changes how forgiving you can afford to be. Behaviors and personality traits live on a continuum, and some people can flex toward the other end of that continuum situationally, especially with the right coaching and enough motivation to do it. An unassuming candidate might learn to speak up especially once they become comfortable in the role. A more deliberate decision-maker can learn to move faster when you're clear about priorities and timelines.
Critical thinking skills don't flex the same way. The research I’ve written about before is fairly consistent that cognitive ability is one of the more stable traits a person carries into adulthood, which means a real gap there deserves more caution than an equivalent-looking gap in a behavioral scale.
It's worth considering the real cost of being wrong in either direction for a specific role based on the scope and breadth of that role. A professional individual contributor role and a role managing a team of twelve carry very different stakes for the same size of mismatch.
Finally, hiring managers should be realistic in how much time and effort they are willing to put into the coaching process. Some managers have a real gift for developing talent and thrive on the ability to help people grow into successful contributors. For other managers, this falls to the bottom of the priority list. If it's a coachable trait and you're willing to put the time in, go for it!
A miss on a few characteristics, paired with a strong interview and solid references, is usually a yellow flag worth exploring rather than a reason to pass. Ask direct, specific questions about the gaps. If a role calls for someone more autonomous and the candidate’s results lean more reliant, ask them to walk you through a time they had to make a significant decision with minimal guidance, and listen for whether they actually did it, or whether they froze and waited for someone else to step in. The answer tells you far more than the score alone ever could. The good news is that assessments like PXT Select provide recommended interview questions to help you determine how an individual has closed those gaps in the past. It makes it easy for recruiters and hiring managers to quickly learn how big a risk it actually is. Download a sample of the PXT Comprehensive Selection Report here.
Some mismatches deserve real weight, and pretending otherwise does nobody any favors. A significant gap in critical thinking skills for a role where the complexity is going to climb is worth taking seriously. The same goes for other characteristics that you know are essential for success in the position, with the team, and in the organization. A borderline mismatch that you validate with a shaky reference or a vague interview answer, might also become a "no go." One yellow flag alone rarely means no. Several pointing the same direction usually does.
What if the mismatch is specifically in critical thinking skills or thinking style? Take it more seriously than a behavior, personality, or motivational interests mismatch of similar size, particularly if the role’s complexity is likely to grow over time.
Can someone “outperform” a lower fit score? Yes, especially when the gap is in a flexible trait, the rest of the evidence/interview/references is strong, and the coaching process starts on Day 1. Fit scores describe a tendency, not a guarantee. Download a sample of the PXT Select Coaching Report to see how it can give you a quick boost for understanding and closing gaps with your new hires.
What if HR loves a candidate but the assessment results don’t match? That’s not a contradiction to resolve in favor of one side automatically. Assessments open your eyes to things you might miss and other people will likely have different perspectives. Check out my blog post "3 is the Magic Number Behind Every Great Hire" to learn how to overcome perception mismatches.
Should I tell a candidate about their fit or match to our target profile? I do not recommend that you share assessment results with candidates until you hire them. And then, absolutely yes, you should integrate the results into several steps on the onboarding path. Explore all the PXT Select Reports to get ideas for using assessment results post-hire. It's a great way to maximize the return on your investment in candidate screening assessments.
Is there a fit so poor I should never proceed? There’s no hard universal cutoff, but a very low score combined with real concerns from the interview or references is a different situation than a moderate score standing alone. After you use an assessment tool for a while, you'll start to get a feel for thresholds you are willing to tolerate and characteristics that are particularly important to your organization.
Does the answer change for an internal promotion versus an external hire? Somewhat. With an internal candidate, you usually have years of actual observed performance to weigh against the assessment, which is far richer evidence than an interview and references for an external candidate. That track record should carry real weight alongside the fit score, not get overridden by it. Warning! Don't be tempted to skip the assessment, just because you know the individual. The objective data an assessment provides is an excellent way to eliminate bias in your promotional decisions while understanding the potential strengths and risks of the employee moving into a new position.
If you haven’t read "3 is the Magic Number Behind Every Great Hire," it’s the piece that explains why a mismatch should never be the sole deciding factor in the first place. And if you want to understand exactly how a Performance Model or job profile gets built, "What is a Job Profile?" walks through that in full.
A lower fit is information, not a final determination. Use it to ask better questions, not to make the decision for you.
Want to talk through a specific candidate's questionable results? Book a free demo and I’ll walk you through exactly how to intepret results that aren't cut and dried.
Stay Ignited!